Ranking
Comparison
Total Score
Environment
Human Rights
Summary
Ford continues to be one of the strongest performers of the Leaderboard, remaining in second place overall, behind Tesla. However, despite retaining a leadership position, Ford only managed to improve its overall score by 2 percentage points this year. The company is just 1 percentage point ahead of Volvo and has fallen further behind Tesla compared to last year.
Ford was one of the top performers in the Climate and Environmental section this year, overtaking Mercedes to take third place. Most notably, Ford set a supply chain emissions reduction target and also achieved a notable score increase in the battery subsection for publishing new lifecycle assessments for its European EV Explorer and Capri models, which includes disaggregated data for battery supply chain emissions. The company is also one of the strongest performers on the battery mineral due diligence indicators in this subsection.
The company’s strong performance on the climate and environmental indicators was offset by a poor performance on human rights. Although Ford remains the top performer in this section, and improved its score this year in the General and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights subsections, the company’s score stagnated in Workers’ Rights in the Supply Chain, and fell by 19 percentage points in Responsible Minerals Sourcing. This caused the company’s overall human rights score to drop by 2 percentage points. Unless Ford changes tack, it is only a question of time until the company is displaced from its top position.
Key Findings
- Has established a new target to achieve a 25% reduction in its upstream supply chain emissions by 2030.
- Achieved a 10 percentage point score increase in the batteries subsection, for starting to disclose disaggregated battery supply chain emissions data at the vehicle level and for disclosing more specific information on environmental due diligence undertaken for its lithium and nickel supply chains.
- Did not improve its performance against any of the steel and aluminum indicators, despite having set targets with the First Movers’ Coalition on near-zero steel and aluminum procurement.
- The only company assessed that discloses data about the number and percentage of supplier non-conformances, including detail as to their type and severity. However, unlike previous years, the company failed to disclose both the number of Corrective Action Plans issued and whether any contracts were terminated due to non-compliance.
- The only company in the Leaderboard to assess its grievance mechanism against the UN Guiding Principles Effectiveness Criteria, and one of only two automakers to explain rightsholders’ participation in the determination of remedy.
- Lost points in the Responsible Minerals Sourcing subsection for eliminating a mineral-specific grievance mechanism previously in place - an area where the company had in the past demonstrated industry-wide best practice. However, still illustrates some of the best responsible mineral sourcing practices in other areas, including 3TG smelter/refiner disclosure, IRMA auditing, and direct engagement with smelters and refiners.
- Still the only company to fully commit to respecting UNDRIP and FPIC, and place the same unqualified requirements on suppliers. Has now also disclosed steps for guaranteeing FPIC by mining suppliers, as well as an explanation as to how it will respond to findings of FPIC breaches, the only company to do so.
- One of only three companies to commit to a living wage and to require supplies to pay a living wage.
Score Breakdown
Fossil-Free & Environmentally Sustainable Supply Chains
General
Steel
Aluminum
Batteries
Compare by year
Human Rights & Responsible Resourcing
General
Minerals
Indigenous' Rights
Workers' Rights
Compare by year
Supply Chain News & Progress
Latest on Ford
Supply chain transformation is a risk management imperative and opportunity for a competitive edge. Leading brands are already securing a first-mover advantage and leveraging their power to transform legacy supply chains into a force for good. The revolution is underway.
Illegal rare earth mining in Myanmar linked to supply chain of major automakers
A new report by Global Witness has documented the harmful impacts of illegal rare earth mining in Myanmar, linked to the supply chains of major automakers – including Volkswagen, Toyota, Tesla, Nissan, Ford and Hyundai.
Ford, Tesla and VW nickel partnerships in Indonesia linked to climate rights, environmental harms
A massive, multi-billion-dollar nickel industrial complex in North Maluku and nearby nickel mining is violating the rights of local communities, including Indigenous Peoples, causing significant deforestation, air and water pollution, and emitting massive amounts of greenhouse gases from captive coal plants, Climate Rights International said in a report.
For the 124-page report, “Nickel Unearthed: The Human and Climate Costs of Indonesia’s Nickel Industry,” Climate Rights International interviewed 45 people living near smelting operations at the Indonesia Weda Bay Industrial Park (IWIP) and nearby nickel mines on the island of Halmahera. Local residents explained how companies, in coordination with Indonesian police and military personnel, have engaged in land grabbing, coercion, and intimidation of Indigenous Peoples and other communities, who are experiencing serious and potentially existential threats to their traditional ways of life.
Electric vehicle companies such as Tesla, Ford, and Volkswagen that have contracts to source nickel from Indonesia, including from companies with operations at IWIP, should immediately use their leverage to push suppliers to address harms to local communities and the environment, and if necessary, suspend sourcing nickel from companies responsible for such abuses.
Ford signs agreements for various “low-carbon” and “zero-carbon” metals, including steel
Ford has established agreements for “low carbon” steel, ”low-carbon” battery and other metals, and a program to help suppliers eliminate their emissions.
Allegations of supply chain worker rights violations, forced labor and environmental degradation
Ford’s supply chains have been implicated in alleged worker rights violations, forced labor and environmental pollution affecting the health of local communities: see BHRRC for details and automaker responses.
Our Vision
01 — Equitably
Respecting and advancing the rights of Indigenous Peoples, workers, and local communities throughout the supply chain.
02 — Sustainably
Preserving and restoring environmental health and biodiversity across supply chains, while reducing primary resource demand through efficient resource use and increased recycled content.
03 — Fossil-free
100% electric and made with a fossil fuel-free supply chain.