Summary

• Has set a 2050 target to eliminate all lifecycle emissions, but lacks interim targets for its supply chain and discloses practically nothing in the way of efforts to reduce GHG emissions in its supply chain.
• One of the few automakers that continues to score 0% on the subsections focused on aluminum and steel decarbonization.
• Has still not improved its climate lobbying performance, continuing to be rated by InfluenceMap as one of the most obstructive automakers when it comes to climate policy.
• Discloses slightly more information on some aspects of its human rights due diligence process, although its overall level of transparency in this area is still poor, particularly in relation to its risk identification and assessment processes, as well as the statistical data it provides to demonstrate supplier monitoring activities.
• Has now published a standalone responsible mineral sourcing policy that applies across all minerals and metals, and has significantly improved conflict minerals mapping efforts and disclosures, including in relation to smelters and refiners.
• Performance on Indigenous Peoples’ rights remains abysmal, continuing to score 0% due to a lack of commitments, processes, or actions in this area.
• Improved its score on workers’ rights due to greater disclosure of workers’ rights risks in its supply chain, particularly in relation to child labour and forced labour. However, still fails to cover the basics, such as clearly committing to all ILO fundamental principles and rights at work, and unequivocally requiring suppliers to respect these rights.