排名
比较
总分
环境
人权与负责任采购
排行榜摘要
Toyota’s performance in this year’s Leaderboard has been very disappointing. While improving on two Climate and Environment subsections, the company has either achieved zero progress or seen its scores decrease in each of the remaining 6 subsections. In fact, in terms of year-on-year progress, Toyota is the worst performer overall in this year’s edition, registering an overall score regression of 2 percentage points. As a result, Toyota has slid from 14th to 16th place in the Leaderboard.
In the Climate and Environment section, Toyota was able to improve its score in the General and Batteries subsections, due to setting a new 2030 GHG emissions reduction target, which includes the company’s supply chain, and disclosing additional details on battery circularity efforts. Nonetheless, Toyota is one of only three companies, together with GAC and SAIC, that continues to score 0% on steel and aluminum decarbonization.
On human rights, Toyota failed to maintain the momentum gained last year. Instead of capitalising on its improvements, the company actually regressed in most human rights subsections, including a 14 percentage point drop on Workers’ Rights, the second largest score drop of all companies in all the Leaderboard subsections. The company’s overall human rights score fell by 6 percentage points as a result, the largest overall score drop for one of the Leaderboard sections this year.
主要评估结果
- 丰田已经设下了2050年实现全生命周期碳中和的长期目标与一个2030年的中期目标。这两个目标明确将覆盖公司以及其供应链的范围一、二、三排放。
- 丰田针对电池的循环利用提供了更多细节,包括其对“易拆解设计”(Easy-to-Dismantle Design)的启用,以便于大型电池的回收。这也使丰田成为为数不多的、以具体案例来解释其如何利用设计来完善电池回收流程的公司。
- Still fails on some of the basics for human rights due diligence: not requiring suppliers to respect human rights or workers’ rights, or to undertake minimum due diligence regarding mineral sourcing; not implementing a supply chain grievance mechanism; and disclosing practically nothing in relation to human rights risk assessment processes and identified human rights risks. Additionally, the company provides no statistical data or evidence to substantiate the few basic human rights commitments or processes the company says it has.
- Has a supply chain mapping process in place, but reports no information emerging from this mapping. However, is one of the few automakers to provide minimal information about risks associated with conflict minerals, and to publish a partial list of smelters/refiners in the supply chain, including some information about RMI-conformance.
- In contrast to progress on conflict minerals, does not provide concrete evidence of human rights and environmental due diligence on battery minerals.
- Continues to score 0% on Indigenous Peoples’ rights, consolidating its position as one of the worst laggards in this area.
- Made no progress on Workers’ Rights, even though the company has yet to take the most basic of steps, and discloses less information this year concerning risks to workers’ rights the company has identified in its supply chain.
得分细分
无化石燃料与环境
一般
钢
铝
电池
按年份比较
人权与负责任采购
一般
转型矿产
原住民权利
工人权利
按年份比较
我们的愿景
01 — 公平
供应链的每个环节均尊重与促进原住民、工人和当地社区的权利。
02 — 可持续
在整个供应链中保护和恢复环境健康和生物多样性。同时,通过有效地利用资源与扩大回收对象来减少对初级资源的需求。
04 — 无化石燃料
百分之百纯电动,并通过不使用化石燃料的供应链制造。