순위
비교
총점
환경
인권
리더보드 요약
Toyota’s performance in this year’s Leaderboard has been very disappointing. While improving on two Climate and Environment subsections, the company has either achieved zero progress or seen its scores decrease in each of the remaining 6 subsections. In fact, in terms of year-on-year progress, Toyota is the worst performer overall in this year’s edition, registering an overall score regression of 2 percentage points. As a result, Toyota has slid from 14th to 16th place in the Leaderboard.
In the Climate and Environment section, Toyota was able to improve its score in the General and Batteries subsections, due to setting a new 2030 GHG emissions reduction target, which includes the company’s supply chain, and disclosing additional details on battery circularity efforts. Nonetheless, Toyota is one of only three companies, together with GAC and SAIC, that continues to score 0% on steel and aluminum decarbonization.
On human rights, Toyota failed to maintain the momentum gained last year. Instead of capitalising on its improvements, the company actually regressed in most human rights subsections, including a 14 percentage point drop on Workers’ Rights, the second largest score drop of all companies in all the Leaderboard subsections. The company’s overall human rights score fell by 6 percentage points as a result, the largest overall score drop for one of the Leaderboard sections this year.
주요 조사 결과
- 탄소 중립에 대해 2050년을 목표 시점으로 둔 장기 목표, 그리고 2030년을 목표로 한 중기 목표를 설정했다. 여기에는 공급망까지 적용되는 스코프1, 2, 3 배출량이 명시적으로 포함돼 있다.
- 배터리 순환성 제고를 위한 구체적인 정보를 제공하고 있다. 토요타는 대형 배터리의 재활용성 향상을 위한 “분해하기 쉬운 디자인”을 채택했으며, 배터리 재활용 프로세스를 개선하기 위해 설계를 이용하는 구체적인 사례를 공개하고 있다.
- Still fails on some of the basics for human rights due diligence: not requiring suppliers to respect human rights or workers’ rights, or to undertake minimum due diligence regarding mineral sourcing; not implementing a supply chain grievance mechanism; and disclosing practically nothing in relation to human rights risk assessment processes and identified human rights risks. Additionally, the company provides no statistical data or evidence to substantiate the few basic human rights commitments or processes the company says it has.
- Has a supply chain mapping process in place, but reports no information emerging from this mapping. However, is one of the few automakers to provide minimal information about risks associated with conflict minerals, and to publish a partial list of smelters/refiners in the supply chain, including some information about RMI-conformance.
- In contrast to progress on conflict minerals, does not provide concrete evidence of human rights and environmental due diligence on battery minerals.
- Continues to score 0% on Indigenous Peoples’ rights, consolidating its position as one of the worst laggards in this area.
- Made no progress on Workers’ Rights, even though the company has yet to take the most basic of steps, and discloses less information this year concerning risks to workers’ rights the company has identified in its supply chain.
점수 분석
탈화석연료 & 환경
일반적인
철강
알루미늄
철강
연도별 비교
인권 & 책임 있는 조달
일반적인
광물 추출
Indigenous' Rights
Workers' Rights
연도별 비교
우리의 비전
공정하게
공급망 전반에 걸쳐 원주민, 근로자, 지역사회의 권리를 존중하고 증진합니다.
지속 가능하게
효율적인 자원 사용과 재활용 물질 함량 증가를 통해 1차 자원 수요를 줄이면서 공급망 전반에서 환경과 생물 다양성을 보존하고 복원합니다.
화석연료 없이
100% 전기로 구동되며 화석연료를 사용하지 않는 공급망을 통해 제조됩니다.
