順位
比較
合計スコア
環境
人権・責任ある調達
スコアの概要
Toyota’s performance in this year’s Leaderboard has been very disappointing. While improving on two Climate and Environment subsections, the company has either achieved zero progress or seen its scores decrease in each of the remaining 6 subsections. In fact, in terms of year-on-year progress, Toyota is the worst performer overall in this year’s edition, registering an overall score regression of 2 percentage points. As a result, Toyota has slid from 14th to 16th place in the Leaderboard.
In the Climate and Environment section, Toyota was able to improve its score in the General and Batteries subsections, due to setting a new 2030 GHG emissions reduction target, which includes the company’s supply chain, and disclosing additional details on battery circularity efforts. Nonetheless, Toyota is one of only three companies, together with GAC and SAIC, that continues to score 0% on steel and aluminum decarbonization.
On human rights, Toyota failed to maintain the momentum gained last year. Instead of capitalising on its improvements, the company actually regressed in most human rights subsections, including a 14 percentage point drop on Workers’ Rights, the second largest score drop of all companies in all the Leaderboard subsections. The company’s overall human rights score fell by 6 percentage points as a result, the largest overall score drop for one of the Leaderboard sections this year.
主な評価結果
- 2050年に実質排出ゼロを達成するという目標を掲げているが、2030年の中間目標は使用段階のスコープ3排出量のみを対象としており、サプライチェーン上流や購入した商品に伴う排出は対象外となっている。
- 森林破壊リスクの管理で業界をリードしており、レザーと天然ゴムの新規契約において持続可能性に関する要件を契約上の義務としている。
- Still fails on some of the basics for human rights due diligence: not requiring suppliers to respect human rights or workers’ rights, or to undertake minimum due diligence regarding mineral sourcing; not implementing a supply chain grievance mechanism; and disclosing practically nothing in relation to human rights risk assessment processes and identified human rights risks. Additionally, the company provides no statistical data or evidence to substantiate the few basic human rights commitments or processes the company says it has.
- Has a supply chain mapping process in place, but reports no information emerging from this mapping. However, is one of the few automakers to provide minimal information about risks associated with conflict minerals, and to publish a partial list of smelters/refiners in the supply chain, including some information about RMI-conformance.
- In contrast to progress on conflict minerals, does not provide concrete evidence of human rights and environmental due diligence on battery minerals.
- Continues to score 0% on Indigenous Peoples’ rights, consolidating its position as one of the worst laggards in this area.
- Made no progress on Workers’ Rights, even though the company has yet to take the most basic of steps, and discloses less information this year concerning risks to workers’ rights the company has identified in its supply chain.
スコア詳細
化石燃料を使用しない環境に配慮した持続可能なサプライチェーン
全般
鋼材
アルミニウム
バッテリー
年ごとに比較する
人権・責任ある調達
全般
移行鉱物
先住民の権利
労働者の権利
年ごとに比較する
私たちのビジョン
公正に
サプライチェーン全体にわたり、先住民、労働者、地域コミュニティの権利を尊重し、向上させながら製造される。
サステナブルに
サプライチェーン全体にわたり、環境の健全性と生物多様性を保護・回復すると同時に、効率的な資源利用およびリサイクル材料含有率の増加を通して一次資源の需要を削減しながら製造される。
化石燃料フリー
完全電動車として、化石燃料を使わないサプライチェーンによって製造される。
